Skip to content

Marital Lifestyle/Spending Analyses: The Obvious and Not-So-Obvious

Published
Feb 2, 2023
Share

Marital lifestyle/spending analyses are often required to assist judges and attorneys in developing the amount of support to be paid to one party. The analysis is time consuming, tedious and costly but necessary. The process includes (1) inputting transactions from the parties’ bank, brokerage, savings and credit card statements for a certain period, depending on the issues of the case; (2) categorizing the data into Case Information Statement (“CIS”) categories; and (3) totaling the categories by year. The analysis will show the total amount spent from the accounts for each CIS category. However, the analysis can identify so much more than the obvious. 

Uncover Hidden Assets 

Once the data has been entered from the statements, each transaction must be traced and verified. Any unidentified transaction can lead to the discovery of hidden assets. For example, the identification of an unknown transfer can discover an undisclosed account. Large withdrawals or checks payable to cash for large amounts can reveal potential undisclosed accounts. Alternatively, it can potentially mean that one party is diverting funds to third parties to “hide” money. 

Payments that appear to be legitimate can bring light to something much more. Take, for example, a single payment to a homeowners’ association. This would seem normal to most; however, if the homeowners’ association is something that one of the parties is not familiar with, it could lead to a hidden asset. This single nominal payment could reveal the purchase of a home by one of the parties without the others’ consent or knowledge.  

Dissipation of Assets 

Infidelity might be one reason why the parties are divorcing, and there may be suspicion that monies have been spent on the paramour. A spending analysis may prove the amount spent on the paramour, which could result in a credit to the other party.  

Spending Gaps  

Identifying holes in spending might mean red flags. Unusually low or no spending in certain categories—such as food and home supplies, restaurants, clothing and fuel—can indicate that these items are paid for in cash. Cash payments for expenditures can indicate: 

Cash as a source of income. 

These expenses are paid through an owned business. 

There might be other accounts that weren’t disclosed from which these expenses could be paid.  

Indication of Other Sources of Income 

A marital spending analysis can also reveal undisclosed income sources. An analysis of the inflows into the accounts could identify deposits for which the source is unknown to one of the parties. This might mean another source of income that must be identified by the other party in order to account for the amount when calculating support. 

The analysis can also indicate that the parties are spending well in excess of their disclosed income. If the spending exceeds the disclosed income and is not reconciled through inheritances, loans, debt balances, gifts and so forth, then this could imply that the spending is being funded from an undisclosed source of income.  

Uncovering red flags can produce significant benefits that can far outweigh the time and costs associated with this analysis. This article was originally published on the AAML-NJ Blog. 

What's on Your Mind?

a person in a white coat

Kriste Rodriguez

Kriste Rodriguez is a Managing Director in the Forensic, Litigation and Valuation Services Group with over 10 years of experience in business valuations and matrimonial disputes.


Start a conversation with Kriste

Receive the latest business insights, analysis, and perspectives from EisnerAmper professionals.